A car dealership that unlawfully used green belt land for car storage for nine years has had its bid for official consent turned down.
The Vauxhall Motors dealership, just off the North Circular in Shadbolt Avenue, Chingford, was granted planning permission for a stretch of land just outside the green belt in 2011.
After council officers noticed the encroachment into Lea Valley Regional Park, they encouraged the dealership to apply for planning permission so the matter could be decided by Waltham Forest Council’s planning committee.
The dealership applied for permission to resurface the land for 19 parking spaces and an open display area, arguing this was a special case that justified using green belt land due to the creation of 10 jobs.
At a virtual meeting held on August 4, committee members chose unanimously to reject the application.
Read more: Council losing thousands on empty garages
A spokesperson for the applicant argued the “economic benefits” of allowing the dealership to use the land “clearly outweigh any very limited harm to the green belt”.
He referred to a report, submitted to the council, that explained measures the applicant would take to protect the green belt, including using semi-permeable paving and paying to remove invasive Japanese knotweed from the land.
If the unlawful use of the land had gone unnoticed for one more year, current planning laws mean it would have been immune from any enforcement action.
The dealership currently employs more than 50 full-time staff and 10 part-time staff and claims the expansion would allow it to employ a further 10 people full-time.
In addition to paving the land, the applicant hoped to build a 50sq m shed for storage and servicing.
Read more: Shocking food hygiene violations found in Waltham Forest businesses
While no objections were received from residents, the Lea Valley Regional Park Authority, which is responsible for the land, objected.
They argue the current unauthorised use “has a negative impact on the green corridor and the openness of the area” and that the plans would result in a “substantial loss of habitat”.
Cllr Marie Pye (Lab, Leytonstone) said: “This is designated as green belt land, even if they may not have been using it as such.
“I think we have probably been a little bit too lenient but I understand we were waiting for the Local Plan review to see if the designation changed.”
Regarding her decision to vote against the application, she said: “If every time someone wanted to use Metropolitan Green Belt land, we said ‘it’s going to create jobs, go ahead’, we would not have much grass left in the borough.”
Cllr Alan Siggers (Con, Valley) agreed, adding he did not feel committee members have “much choice really” other than voting against, given the council’s own planning policy.
For more breaking news, local headlines and features, ‘like’ our Facebook page.
We also have a Twitter account: @ELondonGuardian
Follow us to keep up-to-date with news in Waltham Forest and Redbridge.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel