CHEERS erupted in the council chamber tonight as a controversial plan to build a 29-bedroom hotel in Walthamstow was refused.
The chamber was packed with local residents opposed to the plans and councillors voted unanimously to turn the proposal down.
The development, planned for Cedars Avenue, near Hoe Street, would have seen the site extended and converted with no provision for parking.
It would have replaced flats and offices currently situated within the building, which is behind shops in Hoe Street.
Former councillor and Cedars Avenue resident Graham Smith said at the meeting: “It would be tearing up planning policy on the basis of an absurd fantasy about an up-market hotel near two fried chicken shops.
“It cannot be serviced without causing traffic chaos and would involve the loss of 16 jobs.”
Residents believe the site is too small to hold a hotel that size and also raised concerns over litter, noise and possible anti-social behaviour.
It has also been claimed the site could end up becoming temporary accommodation for families.
Speaking at the meeting, committee member Cllr Milton Martin said: “My concern is not just for the people living there but for their friends and visitors as well.
“Where traffic is concerned, there would be extra pressure to exacerbate the whole situation.”
Cllr Alan Siggers added: “What can I say other than no, under any circumstances?
“We’re expected to accept the idea this is some going to be a tourist Mecca in Waltham Forest – it’s not going to happen.”
A report put before councillors recommended, saying: “There is a shortage of hotel accommodation within the borough and a town centre location such as this is considered to a good one for a new hotel facility.
“The residential accommodation that would be lost is not of a high standard, with habitable room windows facing onto either the public footway or rear access.”
Claims that there is an ‘overriding need’ for such a development were also disputed.
Developers would have had to pay for a disabled parking bay in Cedars Avenue and contribute £15,000 towards environmental improvements if permission had been given.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here